Showing posts with label disney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disney. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
Zootopia
You know what, I think Zootopia has proven to be successful enough to be included in the new Walt Disney Signature Collection series. Who agrees?
Sunday, December 27, 2015
The Force Awakens review
The Force Awakens is a definite step up from the prequel trilogy (I liked Revenge of the Sith quite a bit and Attack of the Clones somewhat). The focus is back on the storytelling in the search to find Luke before the new form of the Galactic Empire, the First Order, led by Kylo Ren, General Hux and Leader Snoke do, and I like the characters of Kylo Ren and Hux as villains quite a bit.
We get some new characters here, and I do like them. I liked the older Han Solo the best, though; when I first saw this film in Kerrville, I thought it was a bit slow until he shows up. Then the characterization, action, and emotion build from there to a great climax at the First Order's Starkiller Base.
I also saw this in the D-Box seating gimmick at the Santikos Palladium AVX in northern San Antonio today, and, let's just say, it's like riding Star Tours at Disney World/Disneyland for two hours, but not too rough to make you lose your popcorn. That was a lot of fun, and I recommend you see this film, and in D-Box or IMAX if you can. Drive 5 hours if you have to.
Labels:
D-Box,
disney,
disneyland,
Episode 7,
First Order,
IMAX,
J.J. Abrams,
Kylo Ren,
Lucasfilm,
San antonio,
Santikos,
Sith,
Star Tours,
Star Wars,
starkiller,
The Force Awakens,
walt disney world
Monday, December 7, 2015
Inside Out review rating.
I loved this movie. I have a ratings scale now. It's called the Walt Disney "Black Diamond" Classics scale. And this film hits the top of the scale..
It is a Walt Disney Black Diamond Signature Classic!!!
Congratulations, Pixar!!
It is a Walt Disney Black Diamond Signature Classic!!!
Congratulations, Pixar!!
Saturday, December 5, 2015
AMC Studio 30 theater review.
Not a bad place to see a movie. It is starting to show its age, but I came here quite a few times as an adolescent, and aside from the front concession stand, Quantum Bits, being changed into one of AMC's new cafeterias with those lovely Coca-Cola Freestyle machines with the other two concession stands, Wildebeest Feast and whatever the other one was, being shut down, plus the IMAX being added, not much has changed. The seats were nice when this place opened 18 years ago, but they do feel a bit hard now, though the stadium seating gave me a perfect view of the screen. My concern is the area is a bit shady, though this is one of the theaters in the Memorial Village vicinity, and they decided to drive a theater at PlazAmericas/Sharpstown Mall, which was taking some of the shady people, out of business. I do call them out on that for giving the community a little more danger than it needs to have, but this is still a good theater for West Houston. Saw The Good Dinosaur here, and saw it late at night, when there weren't that many people here.
Tuesday, September 15, 2015
Cocktail movie review
This is an old movie; it's from 1988, the year I was born, but it's not a goodie....
Okay, my first instincts on Cocktail is it does have a good soundtrack going into the movie. It's typical teenage behavior, and a reunion that could use more of an emotional connection. And, so, it has a decent vibe going in, and I like Tom Cruise and Bryan Brown's energy. But I do feel it's hohum until we get to that job interview and first bartending scenes, where we get one of those cliches that really doesn't work unless it's a full-blown comedy (Hint: Clip-show mind screw). Last I checked, Cocktail is a love story.
A lot of the character interactions seems awkward to me. The drunk walk is one of those examples.
Bad poem in the "Cell Block". Too narmy and nonsensical.
The movie is rather uneventful, being really only a music video for the accompanying soundtrack and maybe a travel brochure for Jamaica. I think there is a little bit of tension when the baby is mentioned, but I didn't really feel like sitting through the whole movie.
Now there was a small second-run movie palace in Houston called Bel Air, like the ritzy neighborhood in Hollywood, that had a bar with windows into one of the auditoriums. If I were an adult in 1988/1989, and I went into the bar before going to the box office, and I saw Cocktail playing behind the glass, well, good news! It was a free showing! You would NOT be missing out on watching the movie without sound from the Bel Air's bar, because there's nothing going on. I can get more entertainment talking to the theater's barman. Too bad they don't make movie theaters like that anymore as a safety net for other bad movies.
The only good thing about Cocktail IS the soundtrack, and this movie was the debut of the only post "Good Vibrations" big hit from The Beach Boys, which was "Kokomo". That song and the songs in the soundtrack are classic, and you do need to buy this movie to hear the soundtrack.
I only did this one because I played barkeep in New Mexico, and I felt it would be appropriate. Well, I've got a review for one of the lamest 80's films (and the Worst Picture 1988 Razzie winner as I discovered) under my belt, so there's an accomplishment. If you wanna argue the point, this movie may help pretraining for any aspiring bartenders (there's fun in catering at parties, which I'd rather do over watching this movie.).
There is good news. Disney and Touchstone had a considerably better choice in moviemaking with Roger Rabbit the same year. Spend your money on that.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1004420-cocktail/
Okay, my first instincts on Cocktail is it does have a good soundtrack going into the movie. It's typical teenage behavior, and a reunion that could use more of an emotional connection. And, so, it has a decent vibe going in, and I like Tom Cruise and Bryan Brown's energy. But I do feel it's hohum until we get to that job interview and first bartending scenes, where we get one of those cliches that really doesn't work unless it's a full-blown comedy (Hint: Clip-show mind screw). Last I checked, Cocktail is a love story.
A lot of the character interactions seems awkward to me. The drunk walk is one of those examples.
Bad poem in the "Cell Block". Too narmy and nonsensical.
The movie is rather uneventful, being really only a music video for the accompanying soundtrack and maybe a travel brochure for Jamaica. I think there is a little bit of tension when the baby is mentioned, but I didn't really feel like sitting through the whole movie.
Now there was a small second-run movie palace in Houston called Bel Air, like the ritzy neighborhood in Hollywood, that had a bar with windows into one of the auditoriums. If I were an adult in 1988/1989, and I went into the bar before going to the box office, and I saw Cocktail playing behind the glass, well, good news! It was a free showing! You would NOT be missing out on watching the movie without sound from the Bel Air's bar, because there's nothing going on. I can get more entertainment talking to the theater's barman. Too bad they don't make movie theaters like that anymore as a safety net for other bad movies.
The only good thing about Cocktail IS the soundtrack, and this movie was the debut of the only post "Good Vibrations" big hit from The Beach Boys, which was "Kokomo". That song and the songs in the soundtrack are classic, and you do need to buy this movie to hear the soundtrack.
I only did this one because I played barkeep in New Mexico, and I felt it would be appropriate. Well, I've got a review for one of the lamest 80's films (and the Worst Picture 1988 Razzie winner as I discovered) under my belt, so there's an accomplishment. If you wanna argue the point, this movie may help pretraining for any aspiring bartenders (there's fun in catering at parties, which I'd rather do over watching this movie.).
There is good news. Disney and Touchstone had a considerably better choice in moviemaking with Roger Rabbit the same year. Spend your money on that.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1004420-cocktail/
Labels:
1980's.,
bar,
bartending,
Bel Air,
cocktail,
disney,
Houston,
Kokomo,
movie review,
New Mexico,
Roger Rabbit,
the beach boys,
the walt disney company,
theater,
tom cruise,
touchstone,
Worst Picture Razzie
Sunday, August 9, 2015
Disney Editorial
Hey, Disney, I think it's time to rename Pixar Animation Studios Pixar Animation CLASSICS. Everything they're made is gold, and Inside Out confirms it. I just think its appropriate. Sony has it's film division named Sony Pictures Classics, but Pixar Animation Classics would be very honest.
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Disney Editorial: Inside Out Edition
I just came back from watching the Pixar movie Inside Out, and I was very impressed with the concept.
Then I realized, Disney, you need to use Inside Out in the Imagination pavilion in Epcot. Have it be in the theater that housed Captain EO. I wouldn't completely remove Figment's ride, since he's become an iconic character in Epcot, but you can integrate him into Inside Out's Emotions.
I mean, this is common sense. And on that note, I think we need an updated Cranium Command. Inside Out's director, Pete Docter, did work on that.
Then I realized, Disney, you need to use Inside Out in the Imagination pavilion in Epcot. Have it be in the theater that housed Captain EO. I wouldn't completely remove Figment's ride, since he's become an iconic character in Epcot, but you can integrate him into Inside Out's Emotions.
I mean, this is common sense. And on that note, I think we need an updated Cranium Command. Inside Out's director, Pete Docter, did work on that.
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
My RT review of Tomorrowland.
Oh, boy. This is going to be the most complicated review I've written on Rotten Tomatoes yet. Head's up.
First off, while I like George Clooney as an actor, he came across as a bit too much mean spirited when he shows up halfway through the film. Blasting the girl with the door was a bit too much for me. Plus, he doesn't have enough chemistry with the other actors besides Hugh Laurie to be effective as Frank Walker.
But, why did we need all the end of the world stuff? I saw a preview of this movie in the Captain EO theater in the Tomorrowland zone in Disneyland last May, and the sneak preview looked really cool. It detailed how Frank Walker got to Tomorrowland, and I think a story of him growing up and putting his mind to work there would have been a cool, inspirational story to tell. Sadly, it looked like the scenes from the Disneyland sneak preview were the best scenes in the film, as it shifts tone for probably the wrong reasons to being an on the run urban movie, and it takes too long to get back to the fantasy. We didn't see enough of Tomorrowland to really get how that world works, and I think that's a missed opportunity.
The story also committed another sin in regards to the future world's existence, and this is where the film could be considered as having nuked the fridge. We start to talk about the end of the world through several means, including but not limited to global warming, icecaps melting, tornadoes, flooding, nuclear explosions, to name a few. Putting this particular plot point in, I think, was a big mistake.
Some of the characters need work too. You don't particularly care for the ones who die, and they are not written cleverly enough. It all leads to an unenergetic climax and ending, which really let me down.
And of course, the movie had a massive budget. This is the third Disney film in recent years to suffer this problem after John Carter and The Lone Ranger, which I have not seen. If you're going to have a James Cameron-sized production, the writing and action needs to be on the level of Titanic and Terminator. Tomorrowland wasn't.
Disney was hoping for a futuristic, invention themed film, but after seeing this, I'm afraid they have instead crafted their own equivalent to Universal's Waterworld, which is a very bad thing. Yeah, this film has the same potholes as 1995's Waterworld. Amazing how mistakes people have made back in the 90s are resurfacing now.
If you're just interested in decent action, you may want to give Tomorrowland a shot, but it's got the same style-over-substance problems from Waterworld, along with the overbudget from it and 2005's Sahara to match. I'm not going to really recommend it. Skip to after the end of the world with Mad Max if you DON'T take your kids, or go for a second dose of Avengers if you do.
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Disney Editorial And Suggestions 3
If there's a time for Disney to consider trying again at integrating a video game franchise into their business, now is it.
I would strongly suggest taking Sonic away from Sega. I do not think they are doing a particular good job with that franchise, and since Sonic is Mario's longtime rival, and Mario and Nintendo are now integrating with Universal Studios, I see this as a natural maneuver for Disney to take.
More to come...
I would strongly suggest taking Sonic away from Sega. I do not think they are doing a particular good job with that franchise, and since Sonic is Mario's longtime rival, and Mario and Nintendo are now integrating with Universal Studios, I see this as a natural maneuver for Disney to take.
More to come...
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
Disney Editorial And Suggestions 2
Another recommendation I would like to make to Disney President Thomas Staggs is the addition of a water park in the Disneyland Resort.
But not just a normal water park.
I would strongly suggest an indoor water park.
So, why my suggestion?
Well, it seems the next logical step to add a water park to Disneyland now that the renovations on Disney California Adventure are now complete, and we have had time to enjoy the fruits of Disney's labor. Someone on the Internet once compared Disney World and Disneyland by citing Disney World as a desktop computer, and Disneyland as a laptop. That makes sense to me, seeing how much power a desktop and how much room Disney World can grow, while it's more convenient to navigate Disneyland due to it's smaller size. But Disney World DOES have two water parks, plus several resorts with elaborate pools, and the Yacht and Beach Club, which have the quintessential mini-water park, Stormalong Bay. Topping that in Disneyland will be tough, but the challenge is part of the fun.
As for it being indoors, that's both to allow the park to be used regardless of the weather, and to give it an edge by having several levels of pools in a giant multi floored building, each with a Disney theme, and slides that would go down to the lower floors. The themes I would suggest are as follows, but let's keep others in mind.
1. Fantasia and Fantasia 2000
2. The Little Mermaid
3. Pirates Of the Caribbean
4. Finding Nemo
5. Frozen
I have also heard that other companies have built indoor theme parks elsewhere on Earth, and I do feel it's time for Disney, the industry leader, to join the fray.
So, I would build the water park on the Simba parking lot. That is the closest lot to the resort hotels, and the only one within the general rectangle that the resort is shaped like. I am unaware if there may be parking problems, so I WOULD build an extension to the Disney & Friends parking garage before closing the Simba parking lot and initiating the groundbreaking on the water park.
Last, but not least, the name.
Let's call it:
DISNEY MARINE WATER PARK
If Disney were to pull the feet I'm am suggesting off, it would be yet another innovation and technology accomplishment for Disney Imagineers and The Walt Disney Company, and will revolutionize the industry.
This challenge is up to you, Thomas Staggs, and all the wonderful people at Disney!
But not just a normal water park.
I would strongly suggest an indoor water park.
So, why my suggestion?
Well, it seems the next logical step to add a water park to Disneyland now that the renovations on Disney California Adventure are now complete, and we have had time to enjoy the fruits of Disney's labor. Someone on the Internet once compared Disney World and Disneyland by citing Disney World as a desktop computer, and Disneyland as a laptop. That makes sense to me, seeing how much power a desktop and how much room Disney World can grow, while it's more convenient to navigate Disneyland due to it's smaller size. But Disney World DOES have two water parks, plus several resorts with elaborate pools, and the Yacht and Beach Club, which have the quintessential mini-water park, Stormalong Bay. Topping that in Disneyland will be tough, but the challenge is part of the fun.
As for it being indoors, that's both to allow the park to be used regardless of the weather, and to give it an edge by having several levels of pools in a giant multi floored building, each with a Disney theme, and slides that would go down to the lower floors. The themes I would suggest are as follows, but let's keep others in mind.
1. Fantasia and Fantasia 2000
2. The Little Mermaid
3. Pirates Of the Caribbean
4. Finding Nemo
5. Frozen
I have also heard that other companies have built indoor theme parks elsewhere on Earth, and I do feel it's time for Disney, the industry leader, to join the fray.
So, I would build the water park on the Simba parking lot. That is the closest lot to the resort hotels, and the only one within the general rectangle that the resort is shaped like. I am unaware if there may be parking problems, so I WOULD build an extension to the Disney & Friends parking garage before closing the Simba parking lot and initiating the groundbreaking on the water park.
Last, but not least, the name.
Let's call it:
DISNEY MARINE WATER PARK
If Disney were to pull the feet I'm am suggesting off, it would be yet another innovation and technology accomplishment for Disney Imagineers and The Walt Disney Company, and will revolutionize the industry.
This challenge is up to you, Thomas Staggs, and all the wonderful people at Disney!
Labels:
Beach Club,
California,
disney,
disneyland,
disneyland resort,
editorial,
fantasia,
Stormalong Bay,
The little mermaid,
theme park,
thomas staggs,
walt disney world,
water park,
Yacht Club
Saturday, March 21, 2015
Disney Editorial and Suggestions
So I want to congratulate Thomas Staggs for his promotion to President and COO of The Walt Disney Company. You really deserve it. I'd like to make a few suggestions regarding Disney's direction.
First, I actually like Disney as a hotelier. The service and amenities I've received from the Beach Club and the Grand Californian are top notch, and are two of my favorite hotels in the world. Let's expand the hotel business with what I'm calling the Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection of historic and luxury hotels and resorts through the United States. I'm a regular traveler, and I've been to some of the best hotels and hidden gems. One of my new favorites is The Lodge at Torrey Pines. I reviewed that hotel not too long ago, and I really enjoyed it.
Yes, I know the Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection was a video line in the nineties, but we can reuse it to be an equivalent to the Luxury Collection from Starwood, and the Waldorf-Astoria Collection from Hilton.
This is a list of hotels and resorts that might make a worthy addition to the Disney family:
The Menger Hotel, San Antonio, Texas
Arizona Inn, Tuscon, Arizona
La Cantera Resort and Spa, San Antonio, Texas
Mayflower Park Hotel, Seattle, Washington
Lakeway Resort and Spa, Austin, Texas
The Lodge at Torrey Pines, La Jolla, California
The Beverly Hills Hotel, Los Angeles, California
Hotel Bel-Air, Los Angeles, California
More to come.
And on the note of reusing brands, I would reuse the Walt Disney Classics as the Walt Disney Black Diamond Classics upon the end of the Diamond Editions. That line was noteworthy for being a favorite of collectors and it introduced my generation to those movies, plus it was crucial to Disney's development. Plus, the name does work, and I would have this line as a Disney version of the Criterion Collection, a portfolio of the best and most memorable movies in Disney's library, which includes a lot. I have several levels of classics I would propose:
Black Diamond Favorites
Black Diamond Classics
Black Diamond Masterpieces
Black Diamond Timeless Classics
Black Diamond Signature Classics
That last one would be reserved for the best of the best of Disney's films, such as Fantasia, Pinocchio, Beauty and the Beast, WALL-E, Inside Out, Raiders Of The Lost Ark, those movies.
If you go this route, do update and reuse those now-classic logos for these two brands.
That will do it for this editorial. See you next time.
First, I actually like Disney as a hotelier. The service and amenities I've received from the Beach Club and the Grand Californian are top notch, and are two of my favorite hotels in the world. Let's expand the hotel business with what I'm calling the Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection of historic and luxury hotels and resorts through the United States. I'm a regular traveler, and I've been to some of the best hotels and hidden gems. One of my new favorites is The Lodge at Torrey Pines. I reviewed that hotel not too long ago, and I really enjoyed it.
Yes, I know the Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection was a video line in the nineties, but we can reuse it to be an equivalent to the Luxury Collection from Starwood, and the Waldorf-Astoria Collection from Hilton.
This is a list of hotels and resorts that might make a worthy addition to the Disney family:
The Menger Hotel, San Antonio, Texas
Arizona Inn, Tuscon, Arizona
La Cantera Resort and Spa, San Antonio, Texas
Mayflower Park Hotel, Seattle, Washington
Lakeway Resort and Spa, Austin, Texas
The Lodge at Torrey Pines, La Jolla, California
The Beverly Hills Hotel, Los Angeles, California
Hotel Bel-Air, Los Angeles, California
More to come.
And on the note of reusing brands, I would reuse the Walt Disney Classics as the Walt Disney Black Diamond Classics upon the end of the Diamond Editions. That line was noteworthy for being a favorite of collectors and it introduced my generation to those movies, plus it was crucial to Disney's development. Plus, the name does work, and I would have this line as a Disney version of the Criterion Collection, a portfolio of the best and most memorable movies in Disney's library, which includes a lot. I have several levels of classics I would propose:
Black Diamond Favorites
Black Diamond Classics
Black Diamond Masterpieces
Black Diamond Timeless Classics
Black Diamond Signature Classics
That last one would be reserved for the best of the best of Disney's films, such as Fantasia, Pinocchio, Beauty and the Beast, WALL-E, Inside Out, Raiders Of The Lost Ark, those movies.
If you go this route, do update and reuse those now-classic logos for these two brands.
That will do it for this editorial. See you next time.
Labels:
arizona,
austin,
beauty and the beast,
black diamond,
California,
disney,
editorial,
fantasia,
los angeles,
masterpiece collection,
pinnochio,
seattle,
texas,
thomas staggs,
walt disney classics,
washington
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
The Great Mouse Detective
So what do I think of The Great Mouse Detective. This:
This is one of my childhood films, and I do still enjoy it. Do love Vincent Price.
If I had to pick a "dark age" Disney film to lump in with the classics, it's this one. The characters are very good, and play each other off very well. It's very entertaining, and it works.
This is one of my childhood films, and I do still enjoy it. Do love Vincent Price.
If I had to pick a "dark age" Disney film to lump in with the classics, it's this one. The characters are very good, and play each other off very well. It's very entertaining, and it works.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)